STIHL
STIHL ranks near the top because it publishes a 2025 Sustainability Statement that is explicitly framed around ESRS-style disclosure, which increases auditability compared with brand-led sustainability storytelling.
Score
91
Industry
Power Tools
Country
Germany
Report year
2025
Badge
Eligible to use the sustainablereports badge
Score breakdown
Resource efficiency
89In a category where durability, repairability, and materials matter, a structured statement creates a clearer path to evaluate circularity claims without inventing facts.
Impact on environment
90The 2025 disclosure-first format reduces interpretation risk when discussing climate and ecosystem topics for a manufacturing-heavy business.
Social responsibility
86The statement provides governance and value-chain framing, but the hardest labor and upstream material risks still require long-run comparability.
Economic benefits
93A clear long-term strategy narrative supports the idea that sustainability programs are being integrated rather than treated as a separate PR track.
Certifications and signals
Evidence and sources
STIHL Sustainability Statement 2025 (PDF)
STIHL
Official Sustainability Statement published as part of STIHL’s 2025 integrated corporate reporting package (ESRS/CSRD preparation framing).
View sourceSTIHL Integrated Corporate Report 2025 (landing page)
STIHL
Official 2025 integrated corporate report hub that links annual and sustainability reporting content.
View sourceRelated reports
Related rankings
About us
Independent research. No brand sponsorships.
sustainablereports.org organizes public sustainability reports, certifications, and evidence into editorial research pages. We do not accept brand sponsorships, we do not sell ranking positions, and we do not offer paid inclusion.
Badge usage policy
Only brands that have earned a place in one of our “Top 10 sustainable products/brands” rankings may display the sustainablereports badge. Brands outside those rankings may not use it.
Editorial policy
Conclusions are not adjusted for partnerships, marketing budgets, or brand relationships. Rankings and company pages reflect only the quality of public disclosure and evidence available at the time of review.