Makita
Makita makes the first-wave top five because it publishes a full Makita Report 2025 (integrated-style reporting) with explicit sustainability management sections, giving a clean, auditable evidence surface for scoring without guessing.
Score
88
Industry
Power Tools
Country
Japan
Report year
2025
Badge
Eligible to use the sustainablereports badge
Score breakdown
Resource efficiency
84Durability and battery platform design are central in tools; the report provides useful signals but is less sustainability-report-first than top-tier peers.
Impact on environment
83Environmental comparability depends on stable year-over-year disclosure; this first-wave pass keeps Makita as a credible candidate while rewarding stronger evidence packaging in the top five.
Social responsibility
80Workforce and supply-chain topics exist, but the auditability advantage is clearer for companies with dedicated sustainability statements or impact reports.
Economic benefits
90The company-report format connects long-term value creation to operations, but sustainability scoring still needs tighter disclosure comparability.
Certifications and signals
Evidence and sources
Makita IR Library (Makita Report hub)
Makita
Official investor-relations library page that hosts the Makita Report (integrated reporting package), including the 2025 edition.
View sourceMakita Report 2025 (PDF)
Makita
Official Makita Report 2025 (single-page view for printing).
View sourceRelated reports
Related rankings
About us
Independent research. No brand sponsorships.
sustainablereports.org organizes public sustainability reports, certifications, and evidence into editorial research pages. We do not accept brand sponsorships, we do not sell ranking positions, and we do not offer paid inclusion.
Badge usage policy
Only brands that have earned a place in one of our “Top 10 sustainable products/brands” rankings may display the sustainablereports badge. Brands outside those rankings may not use it.
Editorial policy
Conclusions are not adjusted for partnerships, marketing budgets, or brand relationships. Rankings and company pages reflect only the quality of public disclosure and evidence available at the time of review.