IKEA
IKEA stays in the Top 5 because circular-home ambition, sourcing scale, and a broad home-living sustainability agenda still matter, but FY25 reporting transition limits direct climate comparability versus the appliance leaders above it.
Score
84
Industry
Home
Country
Sweden
Report year
2025
Badge
Eligible to use the sustainablereports badge
Score breakdown
Resource efficiency
86IKEA remains a meaningful circularity and resource-use player in the home category, especially through design and value-chain focus.
Impact on environment
82Environmental ambition is broad and relevant, but FY25 omitted climate data pending FY26 reporting, which weakens direct comparability.
Social responsibility
82Fair-and-equal framing and value-chain oversight are visible, though this year's disclosures are less numerically rich than some peers.
Economic benefits
86Home-sector scale gives IKEA real leverage if sustainability changes stick, even though the reporting transition makes short-term measurement harder.
Certifications and signals
Evidence and sources
Sustainability Reporting FY25
IKEA
Explains the shift toward CSRD-aligned Inter IKEA Group reporting and states that FY25 climate data will not be included until the FY26 annual report.
View sourceInter IKEA Group Sustainability Statement FY25
Inter IKEA Group
Official FY25 sustainability statement covering environmental, social, and governance disclosures across the group value chain.
View sourceRelated reports
Related rankings
About us
Independent research. No brand sponsorships.
sustainablereports.org organizes public sustainability reports, certifications, and evidence into editorial research pages. We do not accept brand sponsorships, we do not sell ranking positions, and we do not offer paid inclusion.
Badge usage policy
Only brands that have earned a place in one of our “Top 10 sustainable products/brands” rankings may display the sustainablereports badge. Brands outside those rankings may not use it.
Editorial policy
Conclusions are not adjusted for partnerships, marketing budgets, or brand relationships. Rankings and company pages reflect only the quality of public disclosure and evidence available at the time of review.