Continental
Continental places in the first-wave Top 5 because its 2025 annual report provides an auditable report-grade disclosure surface and contains enough tire-specific operational signals to support comparison beyond marketing pages.
Score
89
Industry
Tires
Country
Germany
Report year
2025
Badge
Eligible to use the sustainablereports badge
Score breakdown
Resource efficiency
88The key resource lens is renewable/recycled material share and circularity pathways; the annual report is most useful where it makes these signals measurable.
Impact on environment
89Environmental credibility comes from emissions and energy disclosures that can be tracked year over year, plus a concrete framing of low-carbon tire production.
Social responsibility
86Worker safety and supply-chain responsibility are disclosed in the annual report format, though raw-material traceability remains structurally difficult across the sector.
Economic benefits
93A credible sustainability strategy in tires is one that survives pricing and cycle pressure; the annual-report disclosure format increases confidence that the topic is treated as a governance and resilience issue.
Certifications and signals
Evidence and sources
Continental AG 2025 Annual Report (PDF)
Continental
Official annual report used as the primary auditable disclosure surface for sustainability-related reporting signals in 2025.
View sourceRelated reports
Related rankings
About us
Independent research. No brand sponsorships.
sustainablereports.org organizes public sustainability reports, certifications, and evidence into editorial research pages. We do not accept brand sponsorships, we do not sell ranking positions, and we do not offer paid inclusion.
Badge usage policy
Only brands that have earned a place in one of our “Top 10 sustainable products/brands” rankings may display the sustainablereports badge. Brands outside those rankings may not use it.
Editorial policy
Conclusions are not adjusted for partnerships, marketing budgets, or brand relationships. Rankings and company pages reflect only the quality of public disclosure and evidence available at the time of review.