ASICS
ASICS earns a top-tier slot because it publishes an Integrated Report 2025 with a stable investor-grade disclosure format that is easier to trace than many sportswear peers, even when its sustainability evidence is not packaged as a standalone ESG report.
Score
86
Industry
Footwear
Country
Japan
Report year
2025
Badge
Eligible to use the sustainablereports badge
Score breakdown
Resource efficiency
84Evidence is strongest where product and operations efficiency topics are tied to reporting structure rather than campaign-level storytelling.
Impact on environment
86The integrated reporting format makes it easier to validate climate priorities and progress signals than brand blog posts or isolated announcements.
Social responsibility
82Workforce and value-chain disclosures are present, though comparability still depends on how much detail is carried into supplier-level transparency.
Economic benefits
91Running-footwear economics reward innovation and long-run brand trust; consistent disclosure helps make sustainability investment more financially believable.
Certifications and signals
Evidence and sources
ASICS Integrated Report 2025 (PDF)
ASICS
Official investor-relations library download for FY2025 reporting.
View sourceASICS Integrated Report library
ASICS
Official reporting archive used to confirm report year lineage and access stability.
View sourceRelated reports
Related rankings
About us
Independent research. No brand sponsorships.
sustainablereports.org organizes public sustainability reports, certifications, and evidence into editorial research pages. We do not accept brand sponsorships, we do not sell ranking positions, and we do not offer paid inclusion.
Badge usage policy
Only brands that have earned a place in one of our “Top 10 sustainable products/brands” rankings may display the sustainablereports badge. Brands outside those rankings may not use it.
Editorial policy
Conclusions are not adjusted for partnerships, marketing budgets, or brand relationships. Rankings and company pages reflect only the quality of public disclosure and evidence available at the time of review.